The distortion of Quest for Fire

I think that the extreme weather conditions that increase day by day have been blended into human life before I knew it. Until now, when human beings encounter adversity, to overcome the trouble, they gathered their wisdom, and that act invented new technology and passed it on to the next generation. However, the environment, which has been stored as a “distortion” alongside “Quest for Fire”, has already reached a point where it cannot be treated as just a “distortion”. On the other hand, many researchers, engineers, and companies have been working very hard to find solutions to reduce this “distortion” as well.

The most important thing is not to discuss environmental conservation scenarios for 2030, 2050, and 2070. It is, to take practical measures to reduce the CO2 emissions already there, technology and prove this through monitoring.

The quantity of CO2 reductions and the proof by monitoring

It is well known that the sources of CO2 emissions vary according to the energy source. In the same way, for a thermal power plant, we encounter a simple question: which part of the plant we shall grasp to prove the emission reductions? The same is true for other sources of emissions. So far, I have mentioned in the word “it is proof by monitoring”, but there is no easy way to solve it.

In other words, we can say that the word “proof”, which is inextricably linked to reducing CO2 emissions, carries the same weight of developing technologies to reduce CO2 emissions as well. Namely, I think it is more realistic to replace the meaning of grasping CO2 emissions with the word “remove {the lye} of Quest for Fire.